Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #2751

#2751

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 22:15

5 lines
699 bytes

In article <3769@inews.intel.com> bhoughto@bishop.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>Is there a good reason why v*printf() aren't declared in <stdarg.h>?

Yes, because that would have been counter to existing practice,
whereby they are declared by <stdio.h>.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15831@smoke.brl.mil>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <16965@hoptoad.uucp> <15781@smoke.brl.mil> <3769@inews.intel.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
Message-ID: <15831@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 15 Apr 91 22:15:14 GMT
References: <16965@hoptoad.uucp> <15781@smoke.brl.mil> <3769@inews.intel.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 5

Reply to Parent Message