🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.c
Article #2814

Re: Harbison & Steele (was: Re: Bitfields in unions)

#2814
From: M. J. Saltzman
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1991 19:16
51 lines
2834 bytes
In article <5134adce.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> vinoski@apollo.HP.COM (Stephen Vinoski) writes:
>In article <1991Apr23.212105.28138@hubcap.clemson.edu> mjs@hubcap.clemson.edu (M. J. Saltzman) writes:
>>Sorry to bother you all, but does anyone have a list of errata for
>>H&S?  Is it really that bad?  Are there any other good references
>>(short of the standard itself) for day-to-day use?
>
>Several weeks ago I posted a problem with the strcat() function shown
>in the book.  Sam Harbison contacted me and seemed to indicate that he
>was putting together an errata list to be mailed out.
>
>My original posting seems to have started a thread which has
>inadvertantly given the book a bad reputation.  

I actually didn't see this thread.  My posting was in response to
another thread about whether unions could contain bit fields.  The
tone of the post (which I don't have anymore) seemed to be: "Damn!
*Another* error in H&SIII!"  I was concerned, because I found the 
earlier editions to be very useful, and when H&SIII came out, I
went right out and bought it.  It surprised me that there might be
more significant problems with the new edition.

>I have been reading
>H&S III *very* closely ever since.  Most of the problems I have
>encountered in the book so far are typographical, e.g. misspellings,
>font changes, missing tabs.  The "real" problems like those that have
>pointed out in this newgroup are few and far between.
>
>A C reference manual is bound to be very complex; given that fact, I
>would have to say that the error density of H&S III is very, very low.
>In my opinion, the book is definitely good enough for day-to-day use,
>and I highly recommend it.

I'm glad to hear it.  It certainly wasn't my intention to contribute
to the negativity.  Since I've only started following this group 
recently, could someone send me a list of what's been found so far?
Thanks.

>
>
>-steve
>
>
>| Steve Vinoski  (508)256-0176 x5904       | Internet: vinoski@apollo.hp.com  |
>| HP Apollo Division, Chelmsford, MA 01824 | UUCP: ...!apollo!vinoski         |
>| "The price of knowledge is learning how little of it you yourself harbor."  |
>|                                                    - Tom Christiansen       |



		Matthew Saltzman
		mjs@clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.191616.22666@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!wrdis01!gatech!hubcap!mjs
References: <carbide@dce.ie> <680@taumet.com> <72969@brunix.UUCP> <1991Apr23.212105.28138@hubcap.clemson.edu> <5134adce.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!wrdis01!gatech!hubcap!mjs
From: mjs@hubcap.clemson.edu (M. J. Saltzman)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Harbison & Steele (was: Re: Bitfields in unions)
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.191616.22666@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 91 19:16:16 GMT
References: <carbide@dce.ie> <680@taumet.com> <72969@brunix.UUCP> <1991Apr23.212105.28138@hubcap.clemson.edu> <5134adce.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Organization: Clemson University
Lines: 51