🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2403@sdrc.COM>, scjones@thor.sdrc.com (Larry Jones) writes:

> [stuff explaining why <iso646.h> exists]

> If you think this is a crock, then what we need to do is to get it
> shot down by a wide variety of countries at the ISO SC22 level rather
> than having the big bad USA picking on poor little Denmark which is
> how some people have viewed X3J11's objections.

Feh.  Me, what I'll do is what I always do when someone promulgates a
stupid standard: ignore it.  I'll proceed to use "or" as an identifier
whenever it seems to be the appropriate name.  I'll use ??= in strings
when it seems appropriate.  And if someone has problems porting my code
because of this, that's too bad, but I refuse to cripple myself because
others insist on crippling themselves.  At least this time, a new
header is required before the silliness becomes programmer-visible.

					der Mouse

			    mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu