Re: Casting Function Pointers

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #3070

#3070

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Fri, 24 May 1991 21:18

8 lines
961 bytes

In article <1991May24.005025.7714@tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond@jit533.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes:
>There are a few errors and inconsistencies in K&R-I.  And actually I'm waiting
>for K&R-III, because the proposed standard changed a little bit after K&R-II
>and before finalization.

I'm not aware of any changes between the final draft of K&R2 (first printing)
and the official C standard that would make K&R2 less correct; however, there
was at least one change that made K&R2 more nearly correct.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <16259@smoke.brl.mil>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!bellcore!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <1145@mwtech.UUCP> <1991May24.005025.7714@tkou02.enet.dec.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!bellcore!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Casting Function Pointers
Message-ID: <16259@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 24 May 91 21:18:26 GMT
References: <1145@mwtech.UUCP> <1991May24.005025.7714@tkou02.enet.dec.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message