Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3116Re: gcc and NULL function pointers.
From: Blair P. Houghton
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 1991 22:06
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 1991 22:06
14 lines
1092 bytes
1092 bytes
Old chesnuts crack hard... In article <1991Jun4.012914.25418@tkou02.enet.dec.com> diamond@jit533.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) writes: >>On our system, NULL is #defined in a header file to be ((void *)0), >So, be careful casting your uses of the NULL macro!! Better, su to root and erase the `(void *)' part. The most general, and therefore most valuable, way to define NULL is to simply map it to the digit 0. Anything else only complicates the situation unnecessarily (although it might illuminate the occasional compiler bug.) --Blair "Blink-blink."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4641@inews.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!reed!intelhf!ichips!inews!pima!bhoughtoReferences:
<16386@ganymede.inmos.co.uk> <1991Jun4.012914.25418@tkou02.enet.dec.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!reed!intelhf!ichips!inews!pima!bhoughto From: bhoughto@pima.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: gcc and NULL function pointers. Message-ID: <4641@inews.intel.com> Date: 9 Jun 91 22:06:33 GMT References: <16386@ganymede.inmos.co.uk> <1991Jun4.012914.25418@tkou02.enet.dec.com> Sender: news@inews.intel.com Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ Lines: 14