Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3124Re: gcc and NULL function pointers.
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1991 16:27
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1991 16:27
5 lines
780 bytes
780 bytes
In article <1991Jun10.081924.26439@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes: >The header file would, therefore, be wrong. No, Norman was right. #define NULL 0 is always a proper way for an implementation to define NULL in the standard headers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16381@smoke.brl.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwynReferences:
<1991Jun10.061202.25199@kithrup.COM> <1991Jun10.073125.25120@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <1991Jun10.081924.26439@kithrup.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: gcc and NULL function pointers. Message-ID: <16381@smoke.brl.mil> Date: 10 Jun 91 16:27:49 GMT References: <1991Jun10.061202.25199@kithrup.COM> <1991Jun10.073125.25120@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <1991Jun10.081924.26439@kithrup.COM> Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD. Lines: 5