Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3158Re: gcc and NULL function pointers.
From: Steve Summit
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 21:35
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 21:35
14 lines
1288 bytes
1288 bytes
Let's not have any more null pointer discussion here (of any
kind, neither unfounded speculation nor knowledgeable, correct
responses) until every masochist who is actually interested in
discussing it has trotted over to comp.lang.c and read the
frequently-asked questions list there. (If you can't find a
copy, be patient until July 1 when it will be posted again. Null
pointers have been dogging Usenet for many years; a week's delay
won't kill anybody.)
Followups to alt.religion.computers, and apologies to comp.std.c
for this content-free, inflammatory meta-posting.
Steve Summit
scs@adam.mit.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun20.213539.28188@athena.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!newsReferences:
<ND1CKO3@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Jun20.164003.12151@potomac.ads.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!news From: scs@adam.mit.edu (Steve Summit) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: gcc and NULL function pointers. Message-ID: <1991Jun20.213539.28188@athena.mit.edu> Date: 20 Jun 91 21:35:39 GMT References: <ND1CKO3@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Jun20.164003.12151@potomac.ads.com> Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system) Reply-To: scs@adam.mit.edu Followup-To: alt.religion.computers Organization: Thermal Technologies, Cambridge, MA Lines: 14