Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3277Re: Empty macro arguments
From: D. Scott Bigham
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:00
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:00
24 lines
1275 bytes
1275 bytes
From the Holy Book of <1993Jan18.065413.26508@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
as spake by diamond@jit.dec.com (Norman Diamond) :
>In article <16355@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> ok@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
>>Am I likely to run into any trouble if I just go ahead and use what the
>>standard itself proposes as an extension?
>I don't see any wording in the standard that proposes an extension. [...]
Hmm. Does this imply that a conforming compiler faced with the
following code fragment:
#define fred(a,b,c) a b c
fred(1,,3)
is _required_ to issue a diagnostic?
-sbigham
--
Scott Bigham | The opinions expressed above are
dsb@romeo.cs.duke.edu | (c) 1993 Hacker Ltd. and cannot be
bigham@hercules.acpub.duke.edu | copied or distributed without a
(but not for long) | Darn Good Reason(tm).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<727657228@majors3.cs.duke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!duke!dsbReferences:
<16355@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <1993Jan18.065413.26508@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!duke!dsb From: dsb@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Scott Bigham) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Empty macro arguments Message-ID: <727657228@majors3.cs.duke.edu> Date: 21 Jan 93 23:00:29 GMT References: <16355@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <1993Jan18.065413.26508@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> Organization: n. Arrangement in an orderly or logical fashion. See "miracle". Lines: 24