Re: GOTO single exit point (was: Re: How to eliminate GOTO?)

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #3417

#3417

From: Hoshi Takanori
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 08:10

11 lines
937 bytes

In article <42s5su$4h8@inforamp.net> pcurran@inforamp.net (Peter Curran) writes:

> I'm not sure that this is exactly how I'd write this in a real-world
> situation, but it does the job without multiple returns and without
> deep nesting.

I think your code is _ugly_.  It depends on the order of
initialization of variables A, B, C.  What if you cnage the
order to A, C, B, or add a new variable D between A and B?

hoshi

Technical Details

Message-ID: <HOSHI.95Sep13171048@ext221.sra.co.jp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sran265.sra.co.jp!sran265!hoshi

References: <42s5su$4h8@inforamp.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sran265.sra.co.jp!sran265!hoshi
From: hoshi@sra.co.jp (Hoshi Takanori)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: GOTO single exit point (was: Re: How to eliminate GOTO?)
Date: 13 Sep 1995 08:10:47 GMT
Organization: Software Research Associates, Inc.,Japan
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <HOSHI.95Sep13171048@ext221.sra.co.jp>
References: <42s5su$4h8@inforamp.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ext221.sra.co.jp
In-reply-to: pcurran@inforamp.net's message of Sat, 09 Sep 1995 13:56:49 GMT

Reply to Parent Message