🚀 go-pugleaf

>In article <47s7l0$r18@news.mel.aone.net.au>
>>    do
>>    {
>>        while inner (exp1)
>>        {
>>            if (exp2)
>>                break outer;
>>        }
>>    } while outer;
>> Not as pretty is it? But then again do loops never were as nice as the
>> others.

In article <815950407snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>,
Lawrence Kirby  <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Writing it as:
>    do outer
>    {
>    } while ()
> seems to be most consistent with the other constructs.

This might cause a problem because it's very similar to

    do outer
      ;
    while (whatever)

which is currently legal syntax.

Perhaps a C++-ish syntax like

    do<outer> {
        while<inner>(exp1) {
            if (exp2)
                break outer;  /* or break<outer> */
        }
    } while (whatever);

would be clearer and simpler to parse.

-ccwf