🚀 go-pugleaf

jcoffin@rmii.com (Jerry Coffin) wrote:

[ considerable snippage, with apologies for following up to my own post
] 

>I think this proposal is exactly the sort of thing that should be
>considered for inclusion in C9x:
>1) It doesn't add substantially to the "size" of the language.
>2) To the extent that modifying a parser can be legal, this is.

This should say "trivial" rather than "legal"; that way it at least
makes a _little_ sense.

>3) It has no effect on any currently legal code.

    Later,
    Jerry.

/* I can barely express my own opinions; I certainly can't
 * express anybody else's.
 *
 * The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
 */