Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3551Re: Integral promotion.
From: Walter Murray
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:30
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:30
20 lines
1463 bytes
1463 bytes
Stan Ryckman (stanr@tiac.net) wrote: : In article <4gq8nn$opk@solutions.solon.com>, <msb@sq.com> wrote: : > : >Section 4/1.7: : ># An implementation shall be accompanied by a document that defines all : ># implementation-defined characteristics and all extensions. : I wonder... does the standard define "a document?" : To me this implies that a compiler which provided all such information, : but only in "on-line help" or something, might not be conforming. In the US, in order to have a C compiler validated by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), you have to provide an actual document with all the implementation-defined details. I doubt that "on-line help" would be acceptable to the validation team. Walter Murray Hewlett-Packard Support Technology Lab
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4hlamn$4ji@solutions.solon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4fstj7$2l6@solutions.solon.com> <4g27gn$q5k@solutions.solon.com> <4gnbbp$bhu@solutions.solon.com> <4gq8nn$opk@solutions.solon.com> <4ha88q$jtn@solutions.solon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail From: walterm@hprctbs3.rose.hp.com (Walter Murray) Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c.moderated Subject: Re: Integral promotion. Followup-To: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c.moderated Date: 6 Mar 1996 18:30:15 -0600 Organization: Hewlett Packard Roseville Site Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com Message-ID: <4hlamn$4ji@solutions.solon.com> References: <4fstj7$2l6@solutions.solon.com> <4g27gn$q5k@solutions.solon.com> <4gnbbp$bhu@solutions.solon.com> <4gq8nn$opk@solutions.solon.com> <4ha88q$jtn@solutions.solon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]