Re: Significant name length list

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #356

#356

From: Shankar Unni
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 1989 01:32

7 lines
680 bytes

> - date for 31 character case significant external name version

Hey, if we're going to change the world, why stop at 31 characters? Why
not make the symbols unrestricted in length (within reason - I can live
with 16384 :-)).
---
Shankar.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <12570020@hpclscu.HP.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!ames!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclscu!shankar

References: <2146@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!ames!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclscu!shankar
From: shankar@hpclscu.HP.COM (Shankar Unni)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Significant name length list
Message-ID: <12570020@hpclscu.HP.COM>
Date: 22 Jul 89 01:32:35 GMT
References: <2146@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Calif. Language Lab
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message