Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3561Re: printf() format extensions - looking for beta testers...
From: S. Lee
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 15:58
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 15:58
5 lines
772 bytes
772 bytes
Is it necessary to carry historical baggage by extending printf()? It might be preferable to have a new function with new syntax so you don't need to worry about backward compatibility. Stephen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kr7aj$kbs@solutions.solon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kgljv$l2p@solutions.solon.com> <4kll9l$o5h@solutions.solon.com> <4kobun$8i2@solutions.solon.com> <4koecq$8up@solutions.solon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail From: sl14@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (S. Lee) Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c.moderated Subject: Re: printf() format extensions - looking for beta testers... Date: 14 Apr 1996 10:58:11 -0500 Organization: Nekomi Institute of Technology Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com Message-ID: <4kr7aj$kbs@solutions.solon.com> References: <4kgljv$l2p@solutions.solon.com> <4kll9l$o5h@solutions.solon.com> <4kobun$8i2@solutions.solon.com> <4koecq$8up@solutions.solon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com