Article View: comp.std.c
Article #3586Re: Wishful thinking: return-parameter
From: halasz
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 22:32
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 1995 22:32
18 lines
1066 bytes
1066 bytes
In article <3viv5u$bkv@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>, mfx@cs.tu-berlin.de (Markus Freericks) writes > ..... > My proposal: separate the concepts of return-value and return-control-flow, > and extend the function syntax to (for example) this is _the_ point .... > ..... > return; /* return from foo with whatever has been assigned to x,y */ > } And "return" no longer is _needed_. > ..... > It might be useful to > implicitly declare all return parameters as _register_ (to avoid > address-taking). > ..... There is no point to that, no point to making return-parameter anie different from argument-parameter or local varaible.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3vjlmk$8co@caip.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!caip.rutgers.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ver2u$8bk@caip.rutgers.edu> <3vg8l8$5sd@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <3viv5u$bkv@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!caip.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail From: halasz@caip.rutgers.edu Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Wishful thinking: return-parameter Date: 31 Jul 1995 18:32:52 -0400 Organization: Rutgers University Distribution: world Message-ID: <3vjlmk$8co@caip.rutgers.edu> References: <3ver2u$8bk@caip.rutgers.edu> <3vg8l8$5sd@myst.plaza.ds.adp.com> <3viv5u$bkv@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: caip.rutgers.edu