Re: Standard for time_t ?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #3663

#3663

From: Clive D.W. Feather
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 1995 11:30

16 lines
1213 bytes

In article <3vci7j$aja@newsbf02.news.aol.com>,
FFarance <ffarance@aol.com> wrote:
> You can purchase a copy
> from ANSI for about 70USD or purchase the Schildt book (``The Annotated
> C Standard'', I think) for about 35-40USD.  Ignore the annotations in the
> Schildt book -- just use the book as a cheap copy of the ISO C
> Standard (the book contains a reprint of the C Standard).

Correction: the book contains something similar to, but not the same as,
the C Standard - it omits several portions, and contains at least one
error (and I am ignoring the issue of the missing/duplicated page).

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather                       | If you lie to the compiler,
clive@demon.net        (work, preferred) | it will get its revenge.
clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (home)            |   - Henry Spencer

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DCvzyL.Mtp@stdc.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stdc.demon.co.uk!clive

References: <DCFFs4.5J7@westminster.ac.uk> <3vci7j$aja@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stdc.demon.co.uk!clive
From: clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (Clive D.W. Feather)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Standard for time_t ?
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 1995 11:30:20 GMT
Organization: Demon Internet Limited (personal account)
Message-ID: <DCvzyL.Mtp@stdc.demon.co.uk>
References: <DCFFs4.5J7@westminster.ac.uk> <3vci7j$aja@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stdc.demon.co.uk

Reply to Parent Message