🚀 go-pugleaf

h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no (Hallvard B Furuseth) writes:

>This feature should have a lowercase name.

That would be fine with me -- I don't care about the name,
I just care about the functionality.

Another idea is to change the syntax to make it look more like a string
constant in the first place, e.g. "\<function>".  This would mean the
function name could be part of a larger string without using string
concatenation, e.g. "(\<function> exiting now...)".

One possible advantage of the "\<function>" syntax is its backward
compatibility: it would work with traditional C compilers without change,
though it would just yield `<function>' instead of the function name.