🚀 go-pugleaf

In <42pjb9$2vt@caip.rutgers.edu> halasz@caip.rutgers.edu writes:

>In <42f8n4$eq1@caip.rutgers.edu> halasz@caip.rutgers.edu writes
>+Another form was suggested:
>+	while search: (1) { ... }
>+.  This is good, except for "do ... while (...);".

>In article <42o9e3$bj1@wraith.cc.uow.edu.au>, magao@rabble.uow.edu.au (Magao) writes
>+    No problem ...
>+ 
>+    do search:
>+    {
>+    }
>+    while (...);

>And what if the brackets (braces) are not there?  That is the problem.

   Good point ... I can only excuse myself by stating that I'm sick (and
hence my concentration is a bit off at the moment), combined with the fact
that I *always* put the braces in ... that way, if I ever need to add
something to a loop or other construct I won't accidentaly forget to add
the braces.

   Hmm ... something to think about when my head clears up a bit ;) I *would*
like to be able to label a loop in some way and break out of it.

                                       _/_/_/_/
   __|  __|        _/_|     _/_/_/      _/_|     _/_/_/
  _/_| _/_|      _/  _|   _/          _/  _|   _/    _/
 -/ _|_/ _|    _/_/_/_|  _/ _/_/_/  _/_/_/_|  _/    _/
_/  __/  _|  _/      _|  _/_/_/   _/      _|  _/_/_/

Tim Delaney (TCD Software)     magao@rabble.uow.edu.au