Re: Situation indicators (long) (was: How to eliminate GOTO?)

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4049

#4049

From: halasz
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 01:00

11 lines
1026 bytes

In article <43kd1i$ntr@news0.rain.rg.net>, Paul Long <plong@perf.com> writes
+ Whoa, someone who really likes it!
I too like it.

+ Situation indicators or any of the other proposed solutions have zero
+ chance of making it into the Standard. A langauge-standards body should
+ not invent language features--it should _standardize_ existing art (hear
+ that, C++ committee?).
That is the end of SBEIR, right?  (too much to hope for)
+ Languages such as Gnu C/C++ are where such features should be tried out first.
I, for one, try onlie vendor-extensions, not sumthing peculiar to Gnu-C.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <43np36$nes@caip.rutgers.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!caip.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail

References: <4321kd$cne@news0.rain.rg.net> <GUENTHER.95Sep13001250@lunen.gac.edu> <43kd1i$ntr@news0.rain.rg.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!caip.rutgers.edu!not-for-mail
From: halasz@caip.rutgers.edu
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Situation indicators (long) (was: How to eliminate GOTO?)
Date: 19 Sep 1995 21:00:22 -0400
Organization: Rutgers University
Message-ID: <43np36$nes@caip.rutgers.edu>
References: <4321kd$cne@news0.rain.rg.net> <GUENTHER.95Sep13001250@lunen.gac.edu> <43kd1i$ntr@news0.rain.rg.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: caip.rutgers.edu

Reply to Parent Message