Article View: comp.std.c
Article #4059Re: Identifiers in definitions
From: Christopher R. Volpe
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:19
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 17:19
23 lines
1183 bytes
1183 bytes
In article <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov>, tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov (Tanmoy Bhattacharya) writes: >In article <awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com>, >awiner@oracle.com (Adam Winer) writes: >|> Are identifiers in definitions required? That is, is > >Yes, what else would a definition define? > >|> the following code legit: >|> >|> int foo(int /* a */, int b); > >No. But this is not a definition (so this is unrelated to your first ^^ >question.) By "no", you mean "yes", right? -- Chris Volpe Phone: (518) 387-7766 (Dial Comm 8*833 GE Corporate R&D Fax: (518) 387-6560 PO Box 8, Schenectady, NY 12301 Email: volpecr@crd.ge.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43piev$hka@rdsunx.crd.ge.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bart.crd.ge.com!volpeReferences:
<awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com> <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bart.crd.ge.com!volpe From: volpe@bart.crd.ge.com (Christopher R. Volpe) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Identifiers in definitions Date: 20 Sep 1995 17:19:27 GMT Organization: GE Corporate Research & Development Sender: volpe@bart (Christopher R. Volpe) Distribution: world Message-ID: <43piev$hka@rdsunx.crd.ge.com> References: <awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com> <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov> Reply-To: volpe@ausable.crd.ge.com NNTP-Posting-Host: bart.crd.ge.com