Re: Identifiers in definitions

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4061

#4061

From: Denizen of the Deep
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:54

15 lines
813 bytes

In article <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov>,
Tanmoy Bhattacharya <tanmoy@qcd.lanl.gov> wrote:
>In article <awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com>,
>awiner@oracle.com (Adam Winer) writes: 
>
>|> the following code legit:
>|> 
>|> int foo(int /* a */, int b);
>
>No. 

Though it's not a definition, this looks like a perfectly valid
declaration to me.

-Jon

Technical Details

Message-ID: <43ph0p$g4p@Radon.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Xenon.Stanford.EDU!becker

References: <awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com> <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!Xenon.Stanford.EDU!becker
From: becker@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Denizen of the Deep)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Identifiers in definitions
Date: 20 Sep 1995 16:54:49 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Message-ID: <43ph0p$g4p@Radon.Stanford.EDU>
References: <awiner-1909952245190001@awiner-mac2.us.oracle.com> <43p9bn$l6l@newshost.lanl.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xenon.stanford.edu

Reply to Parent Message