Re: Function-prototype scope: Why?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4074

#4074

From: John Rickard
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 17:32

9 lines
801 bytes

Stan Ryckman (sgr@ae-sun01.alden.com) wrote:
: All pointers-to-struct must have the same "shape"

Is that so?  I've often written code that makes that assumption, but I
can't find any justification for it in the standard.  Can you give
references?

-- 
John Rickard

Technical Details

Message-ID: <43s7k4$j2v@gatekeeper.atml.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.atml.co.uk!jrr

References:

<43cgmb$cec@news0.rain.rg.net> <43er80$458@caip.rutgers.edu> <43pdgk$b3i@rdsunx.crd.ge.com> <43qjdk$loj@caip.rutgers.edu> <43qod5$clf@ae-sun01.alden.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.atml.co.uk!jrr
From: jrr@atml.co.uk (John Rickard)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Function-prototype scope: Why?
Date: 21 Sep 1995 17:32:52 GMT
Organization: Advanced Telecommunications Modules Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Message-ID: <43s7k4$j2v@gatekeeper.atml.co.uk>
References: <43cgmb$cec@news0.rain.rg.net> <43er80$458@caip.rutgers.edu> <43pdgk$b3i@rdsunx.crd.ge.com> <43qjdk$loj@caip.rutgers.edu> <43qod5$clf@ae-sun01.alden.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bass.atml.co.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Reply to Parent Message