Re: printf, va_end, freestanding implementation

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4145

#4145

From: Stan Ryckman
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 1995 13:45

15 lines
891 bytes

In article <DFnL25.5Ew@stdc.demon.co.uk>,
Clive D.W. Feather <clive@demon.net> wrote:

>The symbol printf will always be reserved, but there is no guarantee that
>the function will be available to the programmer in a freestanding
>implementation.

Is the same true of sprintf?  I can see why printf might cause
difficulty in a freestanding environment, but not sprintf.

Thanks,
Stan.
-- 
HELP!  I'M BEING HELD PRISONER IN A .SIGNATURE FACTORY!
    Stan Ryckman   sgr@alden.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <44m623$5hl@ae-sun01.alden.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!alden.com!not-for-mail

References: <44ffgj$90k@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <DFnL25.5Ew@stdc.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!alden.com!not-for-mail
From: sgr@ae-sun01.alden.com (Stan Ryckman)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: printf, va_end, freestanding implementation
Date: 1 Oct 1995 09:45:39 -0400
Organization: Amber & Sneakers Fan Club
Message-ID: <44m623$5hl@ae-sun01.alden.com>
References: <44ffgj$90k@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <DFnL25.5Ew@stdc.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ae-sun01.alden.com

Reply to Parent Message