Re: Comma operator in constant expression

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4281

#4281

From: Clive D.W. Feather
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:30

14 lines
1153 bytes

In article <46mo27$i7@news0.rain.rg.net>, Paul Long  <plong@perf.com> wrote:
>(BTW, I believe that someone said that the ANSI footnotes were not binding, but
>that the same footnotes in the ISO document are binding. Can anybody comment on
>this?)

They have the same (non-normative) status in both documents.

[Ignoring interesting but irrelevant quibbles about whether the
non-normative introduction can make such a determination.]

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather                       | If you lie to the compiler,
clive@demon.net        (work, preferred) | it will get its revenge.
clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (home)            |   - Henry Spencer

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DH1M39.BI2@stdc.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stdc.demon.co.uk!clive

References:

<45uevf$d99@news0.rain.rg.net> <468q49$ljv@news0.rain.rg.net> <9529900.15688@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <46mo27$i7@news0.rain.rg.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!stdc.demon.co.uk!clive
From: clive@stdc.demon.co.uk (Clive D.W. Feather)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Comma operator in constant expression
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 06:30:44 GMT
Organization: Demon Internet Limited (personal account)
Message-ID: <DH1M39.BI2@stdc.demon.co.uk>
References: <45uevf$d99@news0.rain.rg.net> <468q49$ljv@news0.rain.rg.net> <9529900.15688@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <46mo27$i7@news0.rain.rg.net>
Reply-To: clive@demon.net
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stdc.demon.co.uk

Reply to Parent Message