🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <815323606snz@soliton.demon.co.uk>, Ian Cargill <ian@soliton.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
>If it is OK to make setjmp a function, why define it as being a macro, 
>in 7.6.1.1?
>
>If 7.6.1.1 refered to 'The setjmp function' instead of 'The setjmp macro', 
>7.1.7 would still permit a macro version.
>
>-- 
>Ian

The point is that an implimentation is not required to provide a setjmp
function, only a setjmp macro, and many implimentations could not do setjmp
as a function.  This is in contrast to most library calls which must have a
true function even if there is a macro version of the call.

--
Roger Wells  (speaking only for myself)