Article View: comp.std.c
Article #4491Re: Should free() take a pointer to const argument?
From: Mike Rubenstein
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:05
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:05
22 lines
1211 bytes
1211 bytes
Jeff.Dunlop@dbsoft.gigo.com (Jeff Dunlop) wrote: |> fdcu> Even if the realloc call returns |> fdcu> the same address as the one passed to it no strictly conforming program |> fdcu> can rely on this fact or even detect it since all pointers to the |> fdcu> original object are indeterminate after the successful call to realloc. |> |> fdcu> Even if the 2 instances of i have the same memory address they must be |> fdcu> regarded as distinct objects because they can never be referenced at the |> fdcu> same time, pointers to them can never be compared |> |>Why can't they be compared? Once a pointer is freed, use of it in an expression results in undefined behavior. Michael M Rubenstein
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30d2d1b6.58275328@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnewsReferences:
<818626119snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <4am3dn$6s9@natasha.rmii.com> <818898225snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <1a5_9512152056@gigo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: miker3@ix.netcom.com (Mike Rubenstein) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Should free() take a pointer to const argument? Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:05:16 GMT Organization: Netcom Message-ID: <30d2d1b6.58275328@nntp.ix.netcom.com> References: <818626119snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <4am3dn$6s9@natasha.rmii.com> <818898225snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <1a5_9512152056@gigo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-dc14-24.ix.netcom.com X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141