noalias in C9X?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4554

#4554

From: Jonas J. Schlein
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 05:37

15 lines
867 bytes

Now that the CLC FAQ is in print and I have been able to (finally!) obtain
a copy, I have been reading it over carefully.

In question 11.28 the 'noalias' qualifier was mentioned as being introduced
too late to make it into the standard. Also difficulty in giving it well
defined behavior stood as an obstacle.

My question is whether or not this, or something similar will be in
a future standard?

Thanks in advance...
-- 
"If it wasn't for C, we would be using BASI, PASAL, and OBOL."

Jonas J. Schlein  (schlein@gl.umbc.edu)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4cfp2k$4gt@umbc9.umbc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.umbc.edu!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.umbc.edu!not-for-mail
From: schlein@umbc.edu (Jonas J. Schlein)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: noalias in C9X?
Date: 4 Jan 1996 00:37:24 -0500
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore County
Message-ID: <4cfp2k$4gt@umbc9.umbc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: f-umbc9.umbc.edu
NNTP-Posting-User: schlein