Re: noalias in C9X?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #4559

#4559

From: Jutta Degener
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 16:53

19 lines
1191 bytes

schlein@umbc.edu (Jonas J. Schlein) writes:
> My question is whether or not this, or something similar will be in
> a future standard?

Like any other charlatan that wants to stay in business, I won't make
falsifiable claims about the future---but, yes, there is a `restricted
pointer proposal' that is being seriously considered for inclusion
into C9X.

A reasonably current version is available as text, PostScript, and
LaTeX from David Keaton's WG14 site in

	ftp://ftp.dmk.com/DMK/sc22wg14/c9x/aliasing/

a more outdated HTML version is one item down from Dennis Ritchie's
diatribe against noalias in the Swedish "Programming in C" site that
Michael Quinlan has already pointed out.

Jutta Degener (jutta@lysator.liu.se)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4ch0mp$ko8@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!jutta

References: <4cfp2k$4gt@umbc9.umbc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!jutta
From: jutta@cs.tu-berlin.de (Jutta Degener)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: noalias in C9X?
Date: 4 Jan 1996 16:53:45 GMT
Organization: Technical University of Berlin, Germany
Message-ID: <4ch0mp$ko8@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>
References: <4cfp2k$4gt@umbc9.umbc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kugelbus.cs.tu-berlin.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message