🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4d8ved$bdu@natasha.rmii.com>,
jcoffin@rmii.com (Jerry Coffin) wrote:

>AFAIK, as long as any extensions fit the standard, they're legal.  E.g.
>a compiler is free to include extended fucntions and/or keywords as long
>as their identifiers are in the implementor's name space.

And an implementation is free to add other functions in the users'
namespace, I think, as long as 

1)  prototypes only appear when selecting non-standard headers, and
2)  they don't interfere with explicit user names (usually the
explicitly loaded functions take precedence over the system library
routines).