Article View: comp.std.c
Article #492Re: C puzzle
From: Chris Torek
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1989 02:31
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1989 02:31
12 lines
991 bytes
991 bytes
In article <1614@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> dfp@cbnewsl.ATT.COM (david.f.prosser) writes: >You are correct that the length of the array is only necessary >in this example if the "x++;" statement is included. Pointers >to unspecified-sized arrays are valid in the pANS. So they are. Oops, disregard parts of my previous followup.... (I still think they ought to be an error, although this would prevent taking the address of an array of unknown size.) -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19260@mimsy.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!mailrus!ames!haven!mimsy!chrisReferences:
<404@opusys.UUCP> <1614@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!mailrus!ames!haven!mimsy!chris From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: C puzzle Keywords: arrays, compilers Message-ID: <19260@mimsy.UUCP> Date: 25 Aug 89 02:31:46 GMT References: <404@opusys.UUCP> <1614@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742 Lines: 12