Re: nonportable code or incorrect compilers?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5214

#5214

From: Philip Kos
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1988 21:38

11 lines
887 bytes

In article <59649@sun.uucp>, guy@gorodish.Sun.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
> I would not be surprised if the Pyramid compiler were *not* PCC-based.

You're right.  When we got our first Pyramid system here at JHH (January,
1985), OSx cc was was pretty much just vanilla PCC.  This changed in about
mid-1985 as I recall.  Does anyone from Pyramid (Carl?  Sylvan?  Eric?)
want to confirm the date for me?


Phil Kos
A Pretty Happy Pyramid (and soon Sun) User

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1649@osiris.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!oddjob!mimsy!aplcen!osiris!phil

References: <133@daitc.ARPA> <430@uwovax.uwo.ca> <2973@geac.UUCP> <59649@sun.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!oddjob!mimsy!aplcen!osiris!phil
From: phil@osiris.UUCP (Philip Kos)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: nonportable code or incorrect compilers?
Summary: guy is right
Message-ID: <1649@osiris.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jul 88 21:38:18 GMT
References: <133@daitc.ARPA> <430@uwovax.uwo.ca> <2973@geac.UUCP> <59649@sun.uucp>
Organization: Johns Hopkins Hospital
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message