Re: Valid Numbers (was Re: 0x47e+barney not considered C)

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5236

#5236

From: Ron Natalie
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1988 14:56

7 lines
740 bytes

It's obvious that the Microsoft C compiler is just plain wrong.
First, float numbers are not subject to the leading 0 and 0x
octal interpretation.  Second, even if the number were octal,
8's and 9's (probably not such a good idea) are legal and map
to octal 10's and 11's in that position.

-Ron

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Jul.27.10.55.59.1988.7614@topaz.rutgers.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron

References: <1988Jul6.142014.6116@sq.uucp> <283@sdti.UUCP> <295@pcsbst.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron
From: ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Valid Numbers (was Re: 0x47e+barney not considered C)
Message-ID: <Jul.27.10.55.59.1988.7614@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: 27 Jul 88 14:56:00 GMT
References: <1988Jul6.142014.6116@sq.uucp> <283@sdti.UUCP> <295@pcsbst.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message