Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5277Re: Third public review of X3J11 C (a scientist speaks up)
From: Charles Marslett
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 1988 06:47
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 1988 06:47
34 lines
2614 bytes
2614 bytes
In article <36243@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>, leichter@venus.ycc.yale.edu (Jerry Leichter (LEICHTER-JERRY@CS.YALE.EDU)leichter@venus.ycc.yale.edu (Jerry Leichter (LEICHTER-JERRY@CS.YALE.EDU)leichter@venus.ycc.yale.edu (Jerry Leichter (LEICHTER-JERRY@CS.YALE.EDU)leichter@venus.ycc.yale.edu (Jerr writes: > On the contrary: C is NOT woefully deficient for the vast majority of > applications to which the vast majority of "paying users" are interested in > applying it. I find this comment and the attitude of the author woefully parochial -- I do not program in COBOL and I might not even recognize a either a data entry language or a data base language if it hit me in the face, but I do know that more money (real dollars, payroll hours or however you want to look at it) is spent on programs that are much more difficult to write in C than in the language they are written in (and in some cases -- heresy -- that language is even 8086 assembly language!). I am quite certain that spreadsheets garner more user dollars than C compilers for any computers other than Crays and Suns (and Fortran compilers are probable ahead of C compilers on at least the Crays). C is rapidly catching up with Pascal as the second most well known language but it has a long way to go before it becomes as well know (and perhaps as useful)as BASIC (more heresy?). For my purposes, C is the language of choice most of the time (by a fair margin -- I have no second choice, except maybe Modula were C to vanish from the face of the earth). But C is not a universal language and she does not appear to be expanding into other areas of applicability any more rapidly than her elder brother and sister, FORTRAN and LISP. And I think this is both A GOOD THING, and the reason that it is unlikely to be a major language 20 years from now. I have plenty of spare time in 20 years to learn several new small languages and I have no real need to program in Ada or PL/I. (How do you like my personification of programming language? Shall we create a few mythic tales to describe her birth?) Charles Marslett chasm@killer.dallas.tx.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5282@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!killer!chasmReferences:
<36243@yale-celray.yale.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!killer!chasm From: chasm@killer.DALLAS.TX.US (Charles Marslett) Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c,comp.arch Subject: Re: Third public review of X3J11 C (a scientist speaks up) Summary: Let me see numbers (COBOL/DBMS $ vs. C/PASCAL $) Message-ID: <5282@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> Date: 24 Aug 88 06:47:44 GMT References: <36243@yale-celray.yale.UUCP> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 34