Re: observability

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #541

#541

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 1989 04:44

4 lines
759 bytes

In article <1989Sep6.183349.2866@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal) writes:
>Many people claim that "volatile" is meaningless since it is not observable.

In many situations it IS observable.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10964@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn

References:

<1237@gmdzi.UUCP> <10885@smoke.BRL.MIL> <242@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <10937@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1989Sep6.160709.4890@light.uucp> <1989Sep6.183349.2866@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: observability
Message-ID: <10964@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 7 Sep 89 04:44:40 GMT
References: <1237@gmdzi.UUCP> <10885@smoke.BRL.MIL> <242@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <10937@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1989Sep6.160709.4890@light.uucp> <1989Sep6.183349.2866@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message