🚀 go-pugleaf

[Quoting style in quoted messages changed for consistency.]
Bradford R. Daniels (daniels@grue.dec.com) writes:
> > I learned in my high school ... that if I am asked to print out "1024"
> > with 1 significant digit, I should get "1000" printed out.

Chris Torek (chris@mimsy.UUCP) writes:
> No: "1000" has four significant digits (as does "1.000"); you need "1e3".
> I have seen arguments on both sides of this, but only believe the one
> that says `the number of digits written is the number of significant
> digits'.

Well, my high school agreed with Bradford's; I learned that either "1e3"
or "1000" had *one* significant digit, and that to write a value of
1000 with four significant digits you had to say "1000." or "1.000e3".
(Where "e" is taken as an ASCIIfication of "times sign, 10, superscript:")

But such an interpretation of "significant digit" would make section
4.9.6.1 impossible to satisfy for a conversion specification of "%4g"
and a value of 1000 -- the wording requires %f style and no trailing period
-- so it's clear that the authors of the pANS must have had in mind the
interpretation that Chris gives.  Given that there seem to be two conflicting
interpretations it is a pity that they used the words "significant digits".

As for a value of 1024, of course "%.1g" of that should produce "1e3",
or rather, "1e+03".

-- 
Mark Brader			Summary of issue:  Fix FORTRAN-8x.
SoftQuad Inc., Toronto		Committee Response:  This proposal contains
utzoo!sq!msb				insurmountable technical errors.
msb@sq.com			-- X3J11 responses to 2nd public review

This article is in the public domain.