Article View: comp.std.c
Article #558Portability
From: Bryan A. Woodruff
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1989 03:55
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1989 03:55
19 lines
1078 bytes
1078 bytes
Here is a question directed towards those involved with ANSI C. I have noticed a certain amount of care taken towards the "portability" aspect of C... When C was designed, was it not the idea to have a completely portable language from system to system? Do not all systems have a tree directory or some other directory structure? Why then are there not portable functions for accessing the directories? I want to write a module that has the ability to access a directory (read, create, cd, etc...) without having to worry about the operating system (i.e. MS-DOS, UNIX, (flavors), XENIX, etc) When is C going to be completely portable, without having to worry about #IFDEF's???? Bryan Woodruff, Product Manager/Senior Programmer Quality America, Inc. (uunet!quame!bryan)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<116@quame.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!ctrsol!ginosko!uunet!quame!bryanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!ctrsol!ginosko!uunet!quame!bryan From: bryan@quame.UUCP (Bryan A. Woodruff) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Portability Keywords: PORTABILITY Message-ID: <116@quame.UUCP> Date: 9 Sep 89 03:55:02 GMT Lines: 19