Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5669Re: __STDC__ and non-conforming ANSI C compilers
From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1989 16:26
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1989 16:26
9 lines
871 bytes
871 bytes
In article <344@twwells.uucp> bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells) writes:
>...by defining a meaning for __STDC__ == 0,
>we have a standard by which we can judge the use of __STDC__...
An excellent idea. Self-respecting compiler writers would not casually
define __STDC__ == 0 if the ANSI standard gave a specific meaning to
it.
--
Rahul Dhesi UUCP: <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5414@bsu-cs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesiReferences:
<9391@smoke.BRL.MIL> <8731@megaron.arizona.edu> <9405@smoke.BRL.MIL> <344@twwells.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: __STDC__ and non-conforming ANSI C compilers Message-ID: <5414@bsu-cs.UUCP> Date: 23 Jan 89 16:26:32 GMT References: <9391@smoke.BRL.MIL> <8731@megaron.arizona.edu> <9405@smoke.BRL.MIL> <344@twwells.uucp> Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana Lines: 9