Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5707Re: Thoughts on moving towards ANSI
From: Barry Margolin
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1989 06:21
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1989 06:21
21 lines
1411 bytes
1411 bytes
In article <795@n8emr.UUCP> lwv@n8emr.UUCP (Larry W. Virden) writes:
> As an example, he mentioned
>that in APW C and I assume MPW C, a printf format of %p was used for 'pascal'
>format strings, where the length is specified as a 2 byte (?) value before
>the string. Thus, he wasnt going to be able to support the ANSI %p for pointer
>format.
This can be handled simply by providing two implementations of printf,
which can be selected at link time. Another possibility would be to
require something like Unix's "-Dformat=APW_format" for programs being
ported from the old version to the new version, where the APW_format
function implements the old printf semantics. Or you could have a
compiler option that specifies whether you want compatible or ANSI
semantics (it could predefine a bunch of such macros).
Barry Margolin
Thinking Machines Corp.
barmar@think.com
{uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36220@think.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!ucbvax!decwrl!decvax!ima!think!barmarReferences:
<795@n8emr.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!ucbvax!decwrl!decvax!ima!think!barmar From: barmar@think.COM (Barry Margolin) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Thoughts on moving towards ANSI Message-ID: <36220@think.UUCP> Date: 8 Feb 89 06:21:31 GMT References: <795@n8emr.UUCP> Sender: news@think.UUCP Reply-To: barmar@kulla.think.com.UUCP (Barry Margolin) Distribution: usa Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA Lines: 21