Reserved identifiers, was Re: Thoughts on moving towards ANSI

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5711

#5711

From: Jim Gardner
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1989 01:48

6 lines
804 bytes

In article <9621@smoke.BRL.MIL> Gwyn@BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB)) writes:
>Note also that the "pascal" keyword of APW C should be changed to
>something like _pascal_ and then for compatibility the APW-specific

Shouldn't that be __pascal, or _Pascal? Or has ANSI decided to simplify
the reserved identifier rules as an editorial change.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <23551@watmath.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!watmath!jagardner

References: <795@n8emr.UUCP> <9621@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!watmath!jagardner
From: jagardner@watmath.waterloo.edu (Jim Gardner)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Reserved identifiers, was Re: Thoughts on moving towards ANSI
Message-ID: <23551@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Date: 10 Feb 89 01:48:50 GMT
References: <795@n8emr.UUCP> <9621@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Reply-To: jagardner@watmath.waterloo.edu (Jim Gardner)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message