Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5859Re: realloc
From: T. William Wells
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1989 19:51
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1989 19:51
16 lines
1225 bytes
1225 bytes
In article <9964@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
: Happens I'm the POC for 0-sized object extensions to C. There has
: so far been a distinct lack of interest in this area..
Somehow I missed that. How would one have discovered it? When I
submitted my comments on the standard, I did ask that there be zero
sized arrays at the end of structures; I got a NAK.
Could you clue me in on what existing proposals there are on zero
sized objects? Few may be interested, but I am.
---
Bill { uunet | novavax } !twwells!bill
(BTW, I'm may be looking for a new job sometime in the next few
months. If you know of a good one where I can be based in South
Florida do send me e-mail.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<812@twwells.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!billReferences:
<10170@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <10032@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <9974@megaron.arizona.edu> <9122@alice.UUCP> <9964@smoke.BRL.MIL>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells) Newsgroups: comp.std.c,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: realloc Message-ID: <812@twwells.uucp> Date: 2 Apr 89 19:51:06 GMT References: <10170@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <10032@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <9974@megaron.arizona.edu> <9122@alice.UUCP> <9964@smoke.BRL.MIL> Reply-To: bill@twwells.UUCP (T. William Wells) Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale Lines: 16