Re: trigraphs

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5935

#5935

From: Scott David Daniels
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1989 21:30

8 lines
1057 bytes

One fact that seems not to have come out yet is that trigraphs as added
by X3J11 were an existing scheme that was proposed for adoption, not a
new design that simply seemed to be a good idea.  I suspect that is part
of the problem with the Danish proposal: the trigraphs we voted on were
something that had been in use for a couple of years, whereas the Danish 
scheme sounded like "this would be an even better idea:...", very little
evidence there would be no nasty surprises later.
-Scott Daniels (short-term X3J11 member may moons ago

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2469@ogccse.ogc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!ogccse!daniels

References: <4623@freja.diku.dk> <12.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!ogccse!daniels
From: daniels@ogccse.ogc.edu (Scott David Daniels)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: trigraphs
Summary: trigraphs in ANSI-C were established practice
Message-ID: <2469@ogccse.ogc.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 89 21:30:16 GMT
References: <4623@freja.diku.dk> <12.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP>
Reply-To: daniels@ogccse.UUCP (Scott David Daniels)
Organization: Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton, OR
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message