Re: Multiple typedefs

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5955

#5955

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1989 03:02

13 lines
893 bytes

In article <2322@lethe.UUCP> drew@lethe.UUCP (Drew Sullivan) writes:
>typedef unsigned int foo_t;		/* from include file 1 */
>extern foo_t foo(void);
>typedef unsigned int foo_t;		/* from include file 2 */
>extern foo_t foo(void);

No, the second typedef is syntactically invalid.
The conventional way to guard against this is:
	#ifndef _FOO_T_DEFINED
	#define	_FOO_T_DEFINED
	typedef unsigned int foo_t;
	#endif
Sorry about that..

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10167@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!indri!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <2322@lethe.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!indri!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Multiple typedefs
Keywords: typedefs, includes
Message-ID: <10167@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 29 Apr 89 03:02:00 GMT
References: <2322@lethe.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message