Article View: comp.std.c
Article #5966Re: trigraphs
From: Liber
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1989 22:39
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1989 22:39
14 lines
1240 bytes
1240 bytes
In article <2469@ogccse.ogc.edu> daniels@ogccse.UUCP (Scott David Daniels) writes:
>One fact that seems not to have come out yet is that trigraphs as added
>by X3J11 were an existing scheme that was proposed for adoption, not a
>new design that simply seemed to be a good idea.
Just wondering: where exactly had they been used for C before??
(Is this a trigraph sequence? ^^^ :-))
The Rationale implies that the Committee came up with this solution on
their own.
--
_ __ NEVIN ":-)" LIBER nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (312) 979-4751 IH 4F-410
' ) ) "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed,
/ / _ , __o ____ briefed, debriefed or numbered! My life is my own!"
/ (_</_\/ <__/ / <_ As far as I know, these are NOT the opinions of AT&T.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10368@ihlpb.ATT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!att!ihlpb!nevin1References:
<4623@freja.diku.dk> <12.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP> <2469@ogccse.ogc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!att!ihlpb!nevin1 From: nevin1@ihlpb.ATT.COM (Liber) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: trigraphs Message-ID: <10368@ihlpb.ATT.COM> Date: 28 Apr 89 22:39:49 GMT References: <4623@freja.diku.dk> <12.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP> <2469@ogccse.ogc.edu> Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpb.UUCP (55528-Liber,N.J.) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 14