Re: Multiple typedefs

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #5995

#5995

From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Wed, 03 May 1989 10:53

10 lines
984 bytes

In article <12937@haddock.ima.isc.com> suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti) writes:
>Option 1) is what my choice would have been at the dawn of time
>(which is sometime before i knew any C).  Typedef functionality
>can be obtained with #defines.

Only in simple cases.  In complicated situations, typedefs are
practically essential.

None of your four options (plus other suggestions X3J11 considered)
struck me as feasible.  Nice try but no cigar.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10196@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!ncifcrf!nlm-mcs!adm!smoke!gwyn

References: <2322@lethe.UUCP> <10167@smoke.BRL.MIL> <2402@lethe.UUCP> <10190@smoke.BRL.MIL> <12937@haddock.ima.isc.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!ncifcrf!nlm-mcs!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Multiple typedefs
Keywords: typedefs, includes, defines
Message-ID: <10196@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 3 May 89 10:53:57 GMT
References: <2322@lethe.UUCP> <10167@smoke.BRL.MIL> <2402@lethe.UUCP> <10190@smoke.BRL.MIL> <12937@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message