🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7130@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>In article <675@dtscp1.UUCP> scott@dtscp1.UUCP (Scott Barman) writes:
>>	Isn't System V Unix?
>The term Unix has two different meanings.
>One, the generic meaning, derives from common usage.  Unix here is a
>noun that stands for a family of operating systems.  Both Version 7 and
>BSD are Unix.  This meaning of Unix was established long before System
>V existed.
>While System V is sold under the UNIX label, System V
>itself (a noun) is not UNIX (an adjective as used here).

Gee, that's funny.  I learned Unix on an AT&T machine (a 3b5), pure vanilla
AT&T System V Release 2.1.0 UNIX(tm).  A year or so later, I got an account
on this wierd system, called (I think) BSD, or some such.

SysV is as much unix (or more so) as bsd.  Actually, since SysV is larger, I
guess you could say it's *more* unix than bsd.

Oh, and btw:  unix is not a common noun.  Although I miscapitalize it, unix
is, has been, and, probably, always will be, associated with the AT&T
operating system, trademarked under the name UNIX.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "An acid is like a woman:  a good one will eat
seanf@sco.UUCP   |  through your pants." -- Mel Gibson, Saturday Night Live
(408) 458-1422   | Any opinions expressed are my own, not my employers'.