Re: Do non-trivial strictly conforming programs exist?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #603

#603

From: Walter Murray
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1989 20:47

26 lines
1448 bytes

Richard Minner suggested:

> Could not 2.2.4.1 be worded something like (not exactly, mind you):

>     2.2.4.1  Translation limits

> 	     In so far as the implementation has sufficient
> 	storage available, it shall be able to translate and
> 	execute any otherwise conforming program that does not
> 	exceed any of the following limits: 

A relevant passage might be this from Section 1.2, which is hard for me to
reconcile with the requirement in 1.7 about a conforming implementation
"accepting" any strictly conforming program:

   "This Standard does not specify ... the size or complexity of a
   program and its data that will exceed the capacity of any
   specific data-processing system or the capacity of a particular
   processor."

One could argue from this that, as long as it can translate one
particular program as described by 2.2.4.1, a conforming implementation
is free to reject any other program as being too "complex".

Walter
------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <12570026@hpclwjm.HP.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclwjm!walter

References: <1989Sep8.230612.6629@algor2.algorists.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclwjm!walter
From: walter@hpclwjm.HP.COM (Walter Murray)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Do non-trivial strictly conforming programs exist?
Message-ID: <12570026@hpclwjm.HP.COM>
Date: 17 Sep 89 20:47:42 GMT
References: <1989Sep8.230612.6629@algor2.algorists.com>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Calif. Language Lab
Lines: 26

Reply to Parent Message