varargs vs. prototypes

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #6098

#6098

From: Ron Guilmette
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1989 21:54

17 lines
953 bytes

Sorry if this has been covered before, but I'd like to know
one little thing.

Old (non-prototype) function declarations & definitions have
been depreciated right?  So we really should *not* be using
the old style anymore right?  We should do everything with
prototypes right?

So how can I write a function definition for a varargs function
using prototypes?  Is this possible?


-- 
// Ron Guilmette  -  MCC  -  Experimental Systems Kit Project
// 3500 West Balcones Center Drive,  Austin, TX  78759  -  (512)338-3740
// ARPA: rfg@mcc.com
// UUCP: {rutgers,uunet,gatech,ames,pyramid}!cs.utexas.edu!pp!rfg

Technical Details

Message-ID: <237@pink.ACA.MCC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!pp!pink!rfg

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!pp!pink!rfg
From: rfg@pink.ACA.MCC.COM (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: varargs vs. prototypes
Message-ID: <237@pink.ACA.MCC.COM>
Date: 7 Jun 89 21:54:31 GMT
Reply-To: rfg@MCC.COM (Ron Guilmette)
Organization: MCC  Austin, Texas
Lines: 17