Re: Namespace for typedefs

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #6232

#6232

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 17:19

11 lines
843 bytes

In article <38@asterix.stanford.edu> kon@asterix.Stanford.EDU (Ronnie Kon) writes:
>	The namespace for typedefs is (IMHO) wrong...
>	What I think should happen is that either typedefs get their own
>namespace (my preferred solution), or typedefs should automatically appear
>within all struct/union member namespaces. ...
>		...Do other people believe that this should be changed?

Why bother?
-- 
"The N in NFS stands for Not, |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
or Need, or perhaps Nightmare"| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Feb23.171924.12073@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <38@asterix.stanford.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: Namespace for typedefs
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.171924.12073@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <38@asterix.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 90 17:19:24 GMT

Reply to Parent Message