Re: Omission re static linkage

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #848

#848

From: Will Golson
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 21:16

11 lines
851 bytes

>According to section 3.1.2.2, declarations [1] and [3] refer to the
>same identifier, and function f3 has internal linkage.  However, the
>standard neglects to state what declaration [2] refers to.

Actually, there is a linkage conflict between [1] and [3].  As for
[2], section 3.5.1, under 'Semantics', states that block scope
function declarations shall have no explicit storage-class specifier
other than 'extern'.

Will Golson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7330005@hpfcso.HP.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hpfcso!golson

References: <10975@riks.csl.sony.co.jp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hpfcso!golson
From: golson@hpfcso.HP.COM (Will Golson)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Omission re static linkage
Message-ID: <7330005@hpfcso.HP.COM>
Date: 25 Oct 89 21:16:00 GMT
References: <10975@riks.csl.sony.co.jp>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message