🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1989Nov9.200639.8868@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
writes:
|In article <15743@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Zehr)
|writes:
|>There was a recent article in comp.lang.c on obfuscated use of switches
|>and labels mixed together which i decided to try to compile using DEC's
|>VAX C (VMS) compiler:
|>#include <stdio.h>
|>main() {
|>  int i, j=1, k=1;
|>  for(i=0; i<=2; ++i) 
|>    switch(i) {
|>      case 0: for(; ++k % 3; ++j) {
|>      case 1:   printf(" j = %d,", j);
|>      case 2:   printf(" k = %d,", k);
|>              }
|>    }
|>}
|>
|>(i've reduced the code to just the section i have a question concerning)
|>
|>on the '1' and '2' case lines, the compiler gives an error "case labels
|>are valid only in "switch" statements."
|>
|>is this obfuscated code not ANSI or is the compiler broken?  
|
|It is legal, although ugly, ANSI C.  Also legal (but ugly) traditional C.
|Dennis Ritchie himself has officially blessed this disgusting construct,
|and indeed it has one or two legitimate uses.

(Michael Zehr's original posting added for clarity)

I've stared at this and can't make sense of it.  Could someone provide me
with enlightenment?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Plamondon, Intel Corp, 5200 NE Elam Young Pkwy, Hillsboro, OR  97124-6497
Internet: peter@langlab1.hf.intel.com                           +1 503-696-5219
UUNET   : uunet!intelhf!langlab1!peter     "I speak for myself, as best I can."
UUCP    : tektronix!psueea!foobar!langlab1.hf.intel.com!peter    
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------